Received: from BCSpam300.westwindsortwp.local (10.11.13.198) by WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local (10.11.13.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.218.12; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 21:59:01 -0400 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1532224739-0eddee69b61c9e0001-lp3Q2a Received: from esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com (esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com [216.71.147.66]) by BCSpam300.westwindsortwp.local with ESMTP id JXiiTiScZ2YbXoa3 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 21:58:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: David.Aderhold@ww-p.org X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com[216.71.147.66] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 216.71.147.66 Received: from ww-p.org (HELO WWP-WEbmail.westwindsor.k12.nj.us) ([204.10.63.5]) by esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Jul 2018 21:58:58 -0400 Received: from WWP-EXCHANGE3.westwindsor.k12.nj.us ([fe80::8fe:1d7c:3977:8125]) by WWP-WEbmail.westwindsor.k12.nj.us ([fe80::55b5:e4a7:4e77:b6f9%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0389.001; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 21:58:57 -0400 From: "Aderhold, David" To: Hemant Marathe Subject: Fwd: West Windsor Township Meeting 7/30 Thread-Topic: West Windsor Township Meeting 7/30 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Fwd: West Windsor Township Meeting 7/30 Thread-Index: AQHUIUvbzpijO6UC9US48K/7hmR5zaSaYsV+gAAZvQo= Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 01:58:57 +0000 Message-ID: <960D4AAC-5EAF-4F28-94FD-6E0241C36BDC@ww-p.org> References: ,<007ADD14-0E0A-4E41-8965-DC7882B135D6@ww-p.org> In-Reply-To: <007ADD14-0E0A-4E41-8965-DC7882B135D6@ww-p.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_a3fce0d3-3f7d-4063-825f-c4ac715043b5_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com[216.71.147.66] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1532224739 X-Barracuda-URL: https://10.11.13.198:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at westwindsortwp.local X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 9119 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=2.5 KILL_LEVEL=4.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.54162 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Return-Path: David.Aderhold@ww-p.org X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2018 01:59:01.1965 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-Forest-ArrivalHubServer: WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalClientIPAddress: 10.11.13.198 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalServerIPAddress: 10.11.13.52 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageDirectionality: Incoming X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Cross-Premises-Headers-Processed: WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalSize: 12138 X-MS-Exchange-Forest-MessageScope: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageScope: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-HygienePolicy: Standard X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Recipient-Limit-Verified: True X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Disclaimer-Hash: 0935327025034fd0101c9873cd05fde337eb3fa17336b7888bd981da5743cd3f X-MS-Exchange-Forest-RulesExecuted: WWTExch2012 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Rules-Execution-History: OPRA Disclaimer Footer%%%Spam --_a3fce0d3-3f7d-4063-825f-c4ac715043b5_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Krug, Dana" > Date: July 21, 2018 at 8:26:50 PM EDT To: "Aderhold, David" > Subject: Fwd: West Windsor Township Meeting 7/30 Sent from Dana's iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Eilleen Cardone > Date: July 21, 2018 at 7:37:41 PM EDT To: >, > Cc: >, >, >, >, >, >, >, >, > Subject: West Windsor Township Meeting 7/30 Good Evening, I am writing to you as a concerned mother of an active second grader in WWP= schools, and a 3 year old who would possibly attend in a few years. I do = not want additional armed police officers in our schools. I would attend t= he meeting on 7/30 and express my opposition there, however I'm out of town= with family. If the council rejects, my understanding is the decision wou= ld go back to the BOE and parents opposed to this solution will have more o= f an opportunity to express our opinions to the BOE. There have been sever= al social media posts from the Mayor's office worded like the office is att= empting to shut down communication, which is disheartening. My request is not coming from a lack of faith in our police department - I = have the utmost respect for and trust in our officers. I feel to better pr= otect our children we need a balance of mental health support in addition t= o security. Our high schoolers especially have an immediate need for addit= ional mental health and counselor support, where I've read we have had repe= at issues of depression, and suicide threats. I don't work in a building with an armed security guard, my daughter's dayc= are does not have armed security. My son's elementary school does not need= it, either. There are other ways to create a secure building. I feel the= money is better used towards mental health screening and support, and I ha= ve no opposition to additional unarmed security. I feel our community also= deserves more information and opportunities to ask questions about this ch= ange in a non-hostile atmosphere with open dialogue, at hours of the day/we= ek where most working parents are available to attend. What training will the active/retired officers have, and what support would= they receive? The Parkland security officer failed to help that situation= - when was the last time he was evaluated or had a mental health screening= ? Retired officers would be coming back into the workforce from years of e= xposure in a high-stress job, how would they be initially screened and then= what kind of ongoing support would they receive, and how often would they = be evaluated on an ongoing basis? A balance of additional services to students and existing / proposed staff = is just as important (in my opinion more important) as evaluating security = needs. Again, I work in a secure but unarmed local building, as do many people. I= don't see the need for armed guards in our schools and I wasn't aware of t= his earlier BOE vote or I would have voiced my opinion at that time. Thank you for your time and for listening to my opinion on this matter. Sincerely, Eilleen Cardone Please be advised that the Township of West Windsor is subject to the New J= ersey Open Public Records Act. As such, any email sent or received by the T= ownship may be subject to a records request. --_a3fce0d3-3f7d-4063-825f-c4ac715043b5_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Krug, Dana" <Dana.Krug@ww-p.org>
Date: July 21, 2018 at 8:26:50 PM EDT
To: "Aderhold, David" <David.Aderhold@ww-p.org>
Subject: Fwd: West Windsor Township Meeting 7/30



Sent from Dana's iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

Good Evening,

I am writing to you as a concerned mother of an active second grader i= n WWP schools, and a 3 year old who would possibly attend in a few years.&n= bsp; I do not want additional armed police officers in our schools.  I= would attend the meeting on 7/30 and express my opposition there, however I'm out of town with family.  If the cou= ncil rejects, my understanding is the decision would go back to the BOE and= parents opposed to this solution will have more of an opportunity to expre= ss our opinions to the BOE.  There have been several social media posts from the Mayor's office worded l= ike the office is attempting to shut down communication, which is dishearte= ning. 

My request is not coming from a lack of faith in our police department= - I have the utmost respect for and trust in our officers.  I feel to= better protect our children we need a balance of mental health support in = addition to security.  Our high schoolers especially have an immediate need for additional mental health and counsel= or support, where I've read we have had repeat issues of depression, and su= icide threats. 

I don't work in a building with an armed security guard, my daughter's= daycare does not have armed security.  My son's elementary school doe= s not need it, either.  There are other ways to create a secure buildi= ng.  I feel the money is better used towards mental health screening and support, and I have no opposition to additiona= l unarmed security.  I feel our community also deserves more informati= on and opportunities to ask questions about this change in a non-hostile at= mosphere with open dialogue, at hours of the day/week where most working parents are available to attend. <= /div>

What training will the active/retired officers have, and what support = would they receive?  The Parkland security officer failed to help that= situation - when was the last time he was evaluated or had a mental health= screening?  Retired officers would be coming back into the workforce from years of exposure in a high-stress job= , how would they be initially screened and then what kind of ongoing suppor= t would they receive, and how often would they be evaluated on an ongoing b= asis?

A balance of additional services to students and existing / proposed s= taff is just as important (in my opinion more important) as evaluating secu= rity needs.  

Again, I work in a secure but unarmed local building, as do many peopl= e.  I don't see the need for armed guards in our schools and I wasn't = aware of this earlier BOE vote or I would have voiced my opinion at that ti= me.

Thank you for your time and for listening to my opinion on this matter= .

Sincerely,



Eilleen Cardone


Please be advised that the Township of West Windsor is subject to the New J= ersey Open Public Records Act. As such, any email sent or received by the T= ownship may be subject to a records request. --_a3fce0d3-3f7d-4063-825f-c4ac715043b5_--