Received: from BCSpam300.westwindsortwp.local (10.11.13.198) by WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local (10.11.13.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.218.12; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 22:13:59 -0400 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1530843238-0eddee176417e30001-lp3Q2a Received: from esa1.hc2742-60.iphmx.com (esa1.hc2742-60.iphmx.com [216.71.142.71]) by BCSpam300.westwindsortwp.local with ESMTP id xfhqN2qxgwNoZSBv for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 22:13:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: David.Aderhold@ww-p.org X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: esa1.hc2742-60.iphmx.com[216.71.142.71] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 216.71.142.71 Received: from ww-p.org (HELO WWP-WEbmail.westwindsor.k12.nj.us) ([204.10.63.5]) by esa1.hc2742-60.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Jul 2018 22:13:57 -0400 Received: from WWP-EXCHANGE3.westwindsor.k12.nj.us ([fe80::8fe:1d7c:3977:8125]) by WWP-WEbmail.westwindsor.k12.nj.us ([fe80::55b5:e4a7:4e77:b6f9%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0389.001; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 22:13:57 -0400 From: "Aderhold, David" To: Hemant Marathe CC: Rob Garofalo , "Mark Lee (Police)" Subject: Re: Armed Police in WWP Schools Thread-Topic: Armed Police in WWP Schools X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Armed Police in WWP Schools Thread-Index: AQHUFIqy7iUCfgtW8Um6RRDaYrw1AaSBAHnAgAAAarCAAAoG4oAAYHptgAAJg3w= Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 02:13:55 +0000 Message-ID: <4A1725E6-A256-4748-90A4-1CBEC9EBCD17@ww-p.org> References: <08496C729ADB09499C42967E1D7617C8342D6A1F@PTEXCH1.plainsboronj.com>,<129309D3AFB01A42BCB4FB6A4E8C58C5345CE61C@PTEXCH1.plainsboronj.com>,,<808931D0A18FC74390BADDB58A30CF600351B49E4A@WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local> In-Reply-To: <808931D0A18FC74390BADDB58A30CF600351B49E4A@WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: esa1.hc2742-60.iphmx.com[216.71.142.71] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1530843238 X-Barracuda-URL: https://10.11.13.198:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at westwindsortwp.local X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 4073 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=2.5 KILL_LEVEL=4.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.53035 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR Includes a link to a likely spammer email Return-Path: David.Aderhold@ww-p.org X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2018 02:13:59.6795 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-Forest-ArrivalHubServer: WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalClientIPAddress: 10.11.13.198 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalServerIPAddress: 10.11.13.52 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageDirectionality: Incoming X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Cross-Premises-Headers-Processed: WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalSize: 6995 X-MS-Exchange-Forest-MessageScope: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageScope: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-HygienePolicy: Standard X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Recipient-Limit-Verified: True X-MS-Exchange-Forest-RulesExecuted: WWTExch2012 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Rules-Execution-History: OPRA Disclaimer Footer%%%Spam An unarmed officer makes no sense There is no validity to that It doesn=92t make common sense Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 5, 2018, at 9:40 PM, Hemant Marathe = wrote: >=20 > Thanks for forwarding. This is one of objections that parents have raised= . It looks like the email should be in my inbox as well as I see my address= below. I am going to answer the lady. >=20 > Hemant=20 > ________________________________________ > From: Aderhold, David [David.Aderhold@ww-p.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 3:54 PM > To: Hemant Marathe; Rob Garofalo; Mark Lee (Police) > Subject: Fwd: Armed Police in WWP Schools >=20 > FYI >=20 > Sent from my iPhone >=20 > Begin forwarded message: >=20 > From: "Cancro, Anthony" > > Date: July 5, 2018 at 3:18:27 PM EDT > To: "Armour, Guy" >, "Aderhold, David" > > Subject: FW: Armed Police in WWP Schools >=20 >=20 > fyi >=20 >=20 > From: Kiru R. [mailto:kiru86@hotmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 3:12 PM > To: Aderhold, David; amiller@westwindsortwp.com; jbahree@westwindsortwp.com; l= geevers@westwindsortwp.com; ahamilton@w= estwindsortwp.com; vmanzari@westwindso= rtwp.com; Cantu, Peter; Lewis, Neil; Ba= nder, David; Nabi, Nuran; Yates, Ed > Subject: Armed Police in WWP Schools >=20 >=20 > Hello, >=20 >=20 >=20 > I am a resident of West Windsor and recently heard of the resolution to p= lace armed "Resource Officers" in our schools, including our elementary sch= ools. While I understand the fear of a mass shooting, I don't think that th= e solution is for an officer to carry a weapon around our schools. Looking = at the states where shootings have occurred, they've occurred in states wit= h lax gun laws (not a descriptor for NJ, to say the least). Therefore, I do= n't think that the solution in NJ, especially in this town, is to introduce= guns into the schools, making an object that was once largely inaccessible= now available, walking down the halls with its owner every day. If we had = biometric triggers, that'd be one thing, but we don't yet. >=20 >=20 >=20 > For safety, I would much prefer that guns be kept in a gun safe(s) where = only the officer knows the codes/has access to the safe, or the officer sta= ys in the front office and have the unarmed security officers who are alrea= dy in the schools do the patrolling. The last thing we need is a tussle bet= ween student and officer and the student gets the gun or the officer fears = for his life and now we have a dead kid, kids, or dead officer. My husband = and I both graduated WWPHS South in the mid-2000s - we had security officer= s at that time who patrolled and that system was working just fine. The sit= uations the officer is most likely to encounter day to day won't require a = gun to solve, so why have the gun transported at all times throughout the s= chool? >=20 >=20 >=20 > Finally, if you're going through with this, I suggest limiting employment= to State Police only. They have much more extensive training than local co= ps and will be less biased than a cop who's lived here a long time and know= s all the families. >=20 >=20 >=20 > All in all, I am against this plan for many, many reasons beyond the gun = issue and honestly this is something that will make me reconsider staying i= n this town and sending my kids through this system. >=20 >=20 >=20 > ~Julia Ryan >=20 >=20 >=20 > Please be advised that the Township of West Windsor is subject to the New= Jersey Open Public Records Act. As such, any email sent or received by the= Township may be subject to a records request. >=20 > Please be advised that the Township of West Windsor is subject to the New= Jersey Open Public Records Act. As such, any email sent or received by th= e Township may be subject to a records request.