Received: from BCSpam300.westwindsortwp.local (10.11.13.198) by WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local (10.11.13.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.218.12; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:56:22 -0400 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1530820581-0eddee176514920001-lp3Q2a Received: from esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com (esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com [216.71.147.66]) by BCSpam300.westwindsortwp.local with ESMTP id iBO6oOEym1fPugKJ for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 15:56:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: David.Aderhold@ww-p.org X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com[216.71.147.66] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 216.71.147.66 Received: from ww-p.org (HELO WWP-WEbmail.westwindsor.k12.nj.us) ([204.10.63.5]) by esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Jul 2018 15:56:20 -0400 Received: from WWP-EXCHANGE3.westwindsor.k12.nj.us ([fe80::8fe:1d7c:3977:8125]) by WWP-WEbmail.westwindsor.k12.nj.us ([fe80::55b5:e4a7:4e77:b6f9%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0389.001; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:54:36 -0400 From: "Aderhold, David" To: Hemant Marathe , Robert Garofolo , Mark Lee Subject: Fwd: Armed Police in WWP Schools Thread-Topic: Armed Police in WWP Schools X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Fwd: Armed Police in WWP Schools Thread-Index: AQHUFIqy7iUCfgtW8Um6RRDaYrw1AaSBAHnAgAAAarCAAAoG4g== Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 19:54:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <08496C729ADB09499C42967E1D7617C8342D6A1F@PTEXCH1.plainsboronj.com>,<129309D3AFB01A42BCB4FB6A4E8C58C5345CE61C@PTEXCH1.plainsboronj.com> In-Reply-To: <129309D3AFB01A42BCB4FB6A4E8C58C5345CE61C@PTEXCH1.plainsboronj.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_88686168-b764-4a8c-b685-51d6f5ab023f_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: esa2.hc2742-60.iphmx.com[216.71.147.66] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1530820581 X-Barracuda-URL: https://10.11.13.198:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at westwindsortwp.local X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 10093 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=2.5 KILL_LEVEL=4.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.53017 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR Includes a link to a likely spammer email Return-Path: David.Aderhold@ww-p.org X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2018 19:56:22.3738 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-Forest-ArrivalHubServer: WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalClientIPAddress: 10.11.13.198 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalServerIPAddress: 10.11.13.52 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageDirectionality: Incoming X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Cross-Premises-Headers-Processed: WWTExch2012.Westwindsortwp.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalSize: 13432 X-MS-Exchange-Forest-MessageScope: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageScope: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-HygienePolicy: Standard X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Recipient-Limit-Verified: True X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Disclaimer-Hash: 0935327025034fd0101c9873cd05fde337eb3fa17336b7888bd981da5743cd3f X-MS-Exchange-Forest-RulesExecuted: WWTExch2012 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Rules-Execution-History: OPRA Disclaimer Footer%%%Spam --_88686168-b764-4a8c-b685-51d6f5ab023f_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FYI Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Cancro, Anthony" > Date: July 5, 2018 at 3:18:27 PM EDT To: "Armour, Guy" >, "Aderhold, David" > Subject: FW: Armed Police in WWP Schools fyi From: Kiru R. [mailto:kiru86@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 3:12 PM To: Aderhold, David; amiller@westwindsortwp.com; jbahree@westwindsortwp.com; lge= evers@westwindsortwp.com; ahamilton@wes= twindsortwp.com; vmanzari@westwindsort= wp.com; Cantu, Peter; Lewis, Neil; Band= er, David; Nabi, Nuran; Yates, Ed Subject: Armed Police in WWP Schools Hello, I am a resident of West Windsor and recently heard of the resolution to pla= ce armed "Resource Officers" in our schools, including our elementary schoo= ls. While I understand the fear of a mass shooting, I don't think that the = solution is for an officer to carry a weapon around our schools. Looking at= the states where shootings have occurred, they've occurred in states with = lax gun laws (not a descriptor for NJ, to say the least). Therefore, I don'= t think that the solution in NJ, especially in this town, is to introduce g= uns into the schools, making an object that was once largely inaccessible n= ow available, walking down the halls with its owner every day. If we had bi= ometric triggers, that'd be one thing, but we don't yet. For safety, I would much prefer that guns be kept in a gun safe(s) where on= ly the officer knows the codes/has access to the safe, or the officer stays= in the front office and have the unarmed security officers who are already= in the schools do the patrolling. The last thing we need is a tussle betwe= en student and officer and the student gets the gun or the officer fears fo= r his life and now we have a dead kid, kids, or dead officer. My husband an= d I both graduated WWPHS South in the mid-2000s - we had security officers = at that time who patrolled and that system was working just fine. The situa= tions the officer is most likely to encounter day to day won't require a gu= n to solve, so why have the gun transported at all times throughout the sch= ool? Finally, if you're going through with this, I suggest limiting employment t= o State Police only. They have much more extensive training than local cops= and will be less biased than a cop who's lived here a long time and knows = all the families. All in all, I am against this plan for many, many reasons beyond the gun is= sue and honestly this is something that will make me reconsider staying in = this town and sending my kids through this system. ~Julia Ryan Please be advised that the Township of West Windsor is subject to the New J= ersey Open Public Records Act. As such, any email sent or received by the T= ownship may be subject to a records request. --_88686168-b764-4a8c-b685-51d6f5ab023f_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FYI 

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Cancro, Anthony" <acancro@plainsboronj.com>
Date: July 5, 2018 at 3:18:27 PM EDT
To: "Armour, Guy" <garmour@plainsboropolice.com>, "Aderhold, David&quo= t; <David.Aderhold@ww-p.org>
Subject: FW: Armed Police in WWP Schools

 

fyi

 

 

 

= Hello,

=  

= I am a resident of West Windsor and recently heard of the resolution to pla= ce armed "Resource Officers" in our schools, including our elemen= tary schools. While I understand the fear of a mass shooting, I don't think that the solution is for an officer to carry a weapon around= our schools. Looking at the states where shootings have occurred, they've = occurred in states with lax gun laws (not a descriptor for NJ, to say the l= east). Therefore, I don't think that the solution in NJ, especially in this town, is to introduce guns int= o the schools, making an object that was once largely inaccessible now= available, walking down the halls with its owner every day. If we had biom= etric triggers, that'd be one thing, but we don't yet.

=  

= For safety, I would much prefer that guns be kept in a gun safe(s) where on= ly the officer knows the codes/has access to the safe, or the officer stays=  in the front office and have the unarmed security officers who are already in the schools do the patrolling. The last thing = we need is a tussle between student and officer and the student gets the gu= n or the officer fears for his life and now we have a dead kid, kids, or de= ad officer. My husband and I both graduated WWPHS South in the mid-2000s - we had security officers at that = time who patrolled and that system was working just fine. The situatio= ns the officer is most likely to encounter day to day won't require a = gun to solve, so why have the gun transported at all times throughout the school?

=  

= Finally, if you're going through with this, I suggest limiting employm= ent to State Police only. They have much more extensive training than = local cops and will be less biased than a cop who's lived here a long time and knows all the families.

=  

= All in all, I am against this plan for many, many reasons beyond the gun is= sue and honestly this is something that will make me reconsider staying in = this town and sending my kids through this system.  

=  

= ~Julia Ryan

=  

Please be advised that the Township of West Windsor is subject to the New J= ersey Open Public Records Act. As such, any email sent or received by the T= ownship may be subject to a records request. --_88686168-b764-4a8c-b685-51d6f5ab023f_--